The review concludes that while the device is a curious piece of cheap tech for its size and price, it is . The combination of a glitchy interface, poor screen quality, and unwatchable video makes it more of a novelty item than a functional media player.
: A major usability issue is the control system; the "Menu" and "Play" buttons frequently swap functions every few seconds, leading to a highly frustrating user experience. video-8ddc961e6c11be54ab9e3449ef79e567-V.mp4
The video you referenced, , is a classic technology review by Stuart "Ashens" Ashen, originally published in August 2006. It features a hands-on look at an incredibly small and affordable digital MP4 player that, despite its novelty, suffers from significant technical flaws. Product Overview The review concludes that while the device is
Watch the original review here for a detailed look at this tiny, budget-friendly MP4 player's quirks: MP4 Player Review YouTube• Aug 23, 2006 MP4 Player Review The video you referenced, , is a classic
: It is noted for its extremely small footprint—smaller even than a fake iPod Nano—and includes 256MB of internal memory.
: At the time of review, the device cost approximately £10 ($18 USD) , making it a drastically cheaper alternative to the Apple iPod Nano of that era.