According to a teaching by , Ishmael is not considered the biological son of " Abraham ," but rather the son of Abram . Suleman posits that Isaac is Abraham's only son because God only addressed him as "Abraham" after the covenant change, which occurred before Isaac's birth. Key Arguments from Apostle Suleman's Teaching
: Ishmael was born when Abraham (then Abram) was 86; Isaac was born 14 years later when he was 100.
youtube.com/watch?v=PvD41obVdwI">Spirit of Ishmael and its impact on the church? According to a teaching by , Ishmael is
: In mainstream theology, the distinction is usually made between legitimacy in the covenant rather than biological paternity.
While Suleman’s teaching focuses on the name change and spiritual status, the Bible traditionally records both as sons of the same man: youtube
: The teaching aligns with the broader theological view that Ishmael was a "son of the flesh" (born of human effort through Hagar), while Isaac was the "son of the promise" (born through divine intervention). Broader Biblical Context
Apostle Suleman bases this perspective on a specific interpretation of biblical nomenclature and divine recognition: According to a teaching by
: He argues that Ishmael was born to Abram , whereas Isaac was born to Abraham . Since God changed Abram's name to Abraham specifically for the covenant of promise, Suleman asserts that Ishmael belongs to the "old" identity and Isaac to the "new".